Thinking Routines / Step Inside
Choose somebody in the picture — or something — and think from inside them. What can they see, what do they believe, and what do they care about?
Opens on the whiteboard to model with the class · no sign-up · printing is optional
The sheet it prints — optional
Step Inside is a thinking routine in which children take the perspective of a person, creature or object in the material, and answer from inside it: what they perceive, what they know or believe, and what they care about. It builds empathy and close reading together.
Choose who first, out loud, and keep the name visible for the whole routine. Then take the three questions in order, correcting any answer that slips back into 'they' rather than 'I'. Fifteen minutes, and it is far better spoken before it is written.
History and literature obviously, but the strongest version is often science or geography with a non-human subject — a river, a seed, a particle of rock. Children who find character work embarrassing will happily argue about what a river wants.
Pick someone in the corner of the picture, not the obvious person in the middle. When I ran this on a photograph of a Victorian classroom, everyone chose the teacher and produced the same four sentences. The second time I chose the child half out of frame at the back and the discussion was completely different — they had to work out why that child was there at all. The peripheral figure has more to argue about, every time.
People, creatures and objects all work — objects often best.
Children slipping back into their own voice without noticing, so the answers become what they think rather than what the character would. Keep the chosen name visible and correct every 'they' to 'I' out loud until the class self-corrects.
Step Inside suits Year 2 upwards, grade 1 in the US. Younger children stay in their own voice without noticing, so keep correcting it. From Year 5, ask what their character does not know, which is the step that makes it genuinely difficult.
It turns into writing more easily than most routines, because the class has already committed to a voice. Diary entries, letters and monologues all come out of it — and because the answers had to be defensible from the source, the writing stays anchored to evidence.
Once every few weeks, and never twice on the same kind of subject. The routine gets its energy from an unfamiliar viewpoint, so alternating between people, creatures and objects keeps it working. Overused on characters in books, it starts to feel like a writing task.
That is usually a better choice, not a worse one. A figure at the edge of a photograph with no obvious story forces the class to build a perspective out of small details rather than reciting what they already know. Insist every answer points at something actually visible.
| Year group | US grade | What to change | How long |
|---|---|---|---|
| Years 2–3 | Grades 1–2 | Choose together. Keep correcting 'they' to 'I'. | 10 min |
| Years 4–5 | Grades 3–4 | Pairs take different characters and compare. | 15–20 min |
| Year 6 and up | Grade 5+ | Ask what their character does not know. | 20–25 min |
See, Think, Wonder examines a stimulus from outside it. Step Inside goes in. Run See, Think, Wonder first on an unfamiliar image so the class knows what is actually there, then Step Inside to make them account for it from one point of view.
Free · no sign-up to run it · printing is optional
Where this routine comes from: the Step Inside thinking routine was developed by Project Zero, a research center at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Sage Teachers is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Harvard University or Project Zero. The prompts and the wording on this page are our own.