Teaching Routines / Consensus Circle
Everybody says what they think before anybody is allowed to reply. Only then does the group look for an answer all of them can live with — which is a different and harder target than the answer most of them wanted.
A timer for each stage, with what the children do in each · free to try · no sign-up
The sheet it prints — optional
A consensus circle is a discussion structure in which every member of a group states their view once, uninterrupted and without reply, before any discussion begins. Only after everybody has been heard does the group work towards a single answer that all of them can accept.
Consensus here does not mean agreement. It means nobody objects — an answer everybody can live with, which is usually not the answer any individual started with. That distinction is the thing worth teaching.
Twelve minutes, and the second stage is the one people cut. Do not: the whole design rests on all views being audible before the persuading starts.
A vote produces a winner and a group of children who lost. Consensus produces a sentence everybody accepts, which is usually weaker than any individual position and much better understood, because it had to be negotiated rather than counted.
Practically, the test to give children is: can you live with this, even if it is not your favourite? That is a lower bar than agreement, and saying it out loud stops groups deadlocking on trying to make everybody happy.
The phrase that unlocked this for my class was “can you live with it?” Before that I asked “does everybody agree?” and of course they never all did, so groups either deadlocked or the quiet ones caved to end it. Live with it is a much lower bar and children understand it immediately — you can dislike the answer and still not block it. The other rule I enforce hard is no replying during the round. My first attempts had somebody respond to the second speaker and it collapsed into a normal argument within thirty seconds, with the remaining four never getting their turn at all. I now sit in the circle for the first minute and physically hold my hand up at anybody who replies, and after two or three lessons they police it themselves. With Year 6 I ask the group to report what they gave up, which is a far more revealing answer than the consensus itself.
| Year group | US grade | What to change | How long |
|---|---|---|---|
| Years 3–4 | Grades 2–3 | Groups of four. You sit in for the listening round and hold the no-reply rule. | 9 min |
| Years 5–6 | Grades 4–5 | Groups of five or six, written first view, live-with-it test. | 12 min |
| Year 7 and up | Grades 6–8 | Ask them to report what they gave up to reach it, not just what they agreed. | 15 min |
Free to try · no sign-up · the sheet is optional
Written by a practising primary school teacher, and part of the free-to-try Teaching Routines set on Sage Teachers. Last checked August 2026. Everything here is free to try.